<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Setting Up Native IPv6 Connectivity, A Network Operators Overview.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/07/setting-up-native-ipv6-connectivity-a-network-operators-overview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/07/setting-up-native-ipv6-connectivity-a-network-operators-overview/</link>
	<description>Open Source, The Universe &#38; Everything...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niau&#039;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IPv4to6 Migration, A Network Operators Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/07/setting-up-native-ipv6-connectivity-a-network-operators-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Niau&#039;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IPv4to6 Migration, A Network Operators Overview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/?p=780#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] You may checkout the whole post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You may checkout the whole post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidnewman</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/07/setting-up-native-ipv6-connectivity-a-network-operators-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>davidnewman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/?p=780#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Nice survey! Very comprehensive.

This sentence jumped out at me from the hardware section, in the switches discussion:

&quot;All of there current layer two products from these vendors support IPv6 for management.&quot;

At least in my experience, this is only sorta-kinda true. I&#039;ve seen many cases where a switch (or a router, firewall, VPN concentrator, IDS/IPS appliance) may support a bunch of management methods over IPv4 but only one or two methods over IPv6. 

For example, a box might do http, https, telnet, snmp, and ssh over v4 but then only telnet and ssh over v6. So the vendor claims management over v6 -- but only if you can use the subset of management methods they have today.

And that&#039;s for enterprise-grade boxes; v6 management support is even sketchier on SoHo boxes.

All of which is another reason to test before deployment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice survey! Very comprehensive.</p>
<p>This sentence jumped out at me from the hardware section, in the switches discussion:</p>
<p>&#8220;All of there current layer two products from these vendors support IPv6 for management.&#8221;</p>
<p>At least in my experience, this is only sorta-kinda true. I&#8217;ve seen many cases where a switch (or a router, firewall, VPN concentrator, IDS/IPS appliance) may support a bunch of management methods over IPv4 but only one or two methods over IPv6. </p>
<p>For example, a box might do http, https, telnet, snmp, and ssh over v4 but then only telnet and ssh over v6. So the vendor claims management over v6 &#8212; but only if you can use the subset of management methods they have today.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s for enterprise-grade boxes; v6 management support is even sketchier on SoHo boxes.</p>
<p>All of which is another reason to test before deployment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

