<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Building The Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog</link>
	<description>Open Source, The Universe &#38; Everything...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Setting Up Native IPv6 Connectivity, A Network Operators Overview. by Niau&#039;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IPv4to6 Migration, A Network Operators Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/07/setting-up-native-ipv6-connectivity-a-network-operators-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Niau&#039;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IPv4to6 Migration, A Network Operators Overview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/?p=780#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] You may checkout the whole post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You may checkout the whole post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SIP Brute Force Attacks Escalate Over Halloween Weekend. by jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/11/sip-brute-force-attacks-escalate-over-halloween-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/?p=941#comment-23</guid>
		<description>You should have &quot;backtraced it&quot; and &quot;reported it to the cyber police and the state police&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should have &#8220;backtraced it&#8221; and &#8220;reported it to the cyber police and the state police&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Setting Up Native IPv6 Connectivity, A Network Operators Overview. by davidnewman</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/07/setting-up-native-ipv6-connectivity-a-network-operators-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>davidnewman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/?p=780#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Nice survey! Very comprehensive.

This sentence jumped out at me from the hardware section, in the switches discussion:

&quot;All of there current layer two products from these vendors support IPv6 for management.&quot;

At least in my experience, this is only sorta-kinda true. I&#039;ve seen many cases where a switch (or a router, firewall, VPN concentrator, IDS/IPS appliance) may support a bunch of management methods over IPv4 but only one or two methods over IPv6. 

For example, a box might do http, https, telnet, snmp, and ssh over v4 but then only telnet and ssh over v6. So the vendor claims management over v6 -- but only if you can use the subset of management methods they have today.

And that&#039;s for enterprise-grade boxes; v6 management support is even sketchier on SoHo boxes.

All of which is another reason to test before deployment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice survey! Very comprehensive.</p>
<p>This sentence jumped out at me from the hardware section, in the switches discussion:</p>
<p>&#8220;All of there current layer two products from these vendors support IPv6 for management.&#8221;</p>
<p>At least in my experience, this is only sorta-kinda true. I&#8217;ve seen many cases where a switch (or a router, firewall, VPN concentrator, IDS/IPS appliance) may support a bunch of management methods over IPv4 but only one or two methods over IPv6. </p>
<p>For example, a box might do http, https, telnet, snmp, and ssh over v4 but then only telnet and ssh over v6. So the vendor claims management over v6 &#8212; but only if you can use the subset of management methods they have today.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s for enterprise-grade boxes; v6 management support is even sketchier on SoHo boxes.</p>
<p>All of which is another reason to test before deployment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SIP Brute Force Attack Originating From Amazon EC2 Hosts by SIP Attacks From Amazon EC2 Cloud Continue &#124; VoIP Tech Chat</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/04/sip-brute-force-attack-originating-from-amazon-ec2-hosts/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>SIP Attacks From Amazon EC2 Cloud Continue &#124; VoIP Tech Chat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 22:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/?p=708#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] SIP Brute Force Attack Originating From Amazon EC2 Hosts (Building The Net) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SIP Brute Force Attack Originating From Amazon EC2 Hosts (Building The Net) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SIP Brute Force Attack Originating From Amazon EC2 Hosts by Recent SIP Attacks from Amazon EC2 « Asterisk, and other worldly endeavours.</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/04/sip-brute-force-attack-originating-from-amazon-ec2-hosts/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent SIP Attacks from Amazon EC2 « Asterisk, and other worldly endeavours.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/?p=708#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] Recent SIP Attacks from Amazon EC2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recent SIP Attacks from Amazon EC2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SIP Brute Force Attack Originating From Amazon EC2 Hosts by iSnick Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Clouds Are Turning Grey</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/04/sip-brute-force-attack-originating-from-amazon-ec2-hosts/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>iSnick Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Clouds Are Turning Grey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/?p=708#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] Attacks from Amazon servers Link 2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Attacks from Amazon servers Link 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Microsoft Free Workplace in Six Months. Part 3 by paul</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/03/a-microsoft-free-workplace-in-six-months-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/?p=706#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Really enjoyed reading your experience and strategies re this effort. If it resumes, please keep me posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoyed reading your experience and strategies re this effort. If it resumes, please keep me posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SIP Brute Force Attack Originating From Amazon EC2 Hosts by qxork</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/04/sip-brute-force-attack-originating-from-amazon-ec2-hosts/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>qxork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/?p=708#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Ok... Received the response and it was as worthless as the one you received. I also attempted to fill out their form (with the requested info I had ALREADY sent them) and their form failed. Excellent. http://bit.ly/ec2sipattack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok&#8230; Received the response and it was as worthless as the one you received. I also attempted to fill out their form (with the requested info I had ALREADY sent them) and their form failed. Excellent. <a href="http://bit.ly/ec2sipattack" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ec2sipattack</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SIP Brute Force Attack Originating From Amazon EC2 Hosts by qxork</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/04/sip-brute-force-attack-originating-from-amazon-ec2-hosts/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>qxork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/?p=708#comment-9</guid>
		<description>On a positive note, you got a response from them. I&#039;ve gotten nothing -- no acknowledgement, response, or anything. May just end up blocking the entire ec2 cloud as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a positive note, you got a response from them. I&#8217;ve gotten nothing &#8212; no acknowledgement, response, or anything. May just end up blocking the entire ec2 cloud as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SIP Brute Force Attack Originating From Amazon EC2 Hosts by Amazon EC2 SIP Brute Force Attacks on Rise &#124; VoIP Tech Chat</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/04/sip-brute-force-attack-originating-from-amazon-ec2-hosts/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon EC2 SIP Brute Force Attacks on Rise &#124; VoIP Tech Chat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/?p=708#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] SIP Brute Force Attack Originating From Amazon EC2 Hosts (Building The Net) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SIP Brute Force Attack Originating From Amazon EC2 Hosts (Building The Net) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Over One Thousand Dollars For Software Per Computer? by w6bi</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2009/08/over-one-thousand-dollars-for-software-per-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>w6bi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/?p=551#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the numbers I came up with for a presentation I gave at CIPCUG recently:

Computer - $580   which consists of:
Hardware - $500
Operating System (Windows) - $80  &lt;--- the OEM&#039;s &quot;Windows Tax&quot;

Software
MS Office 2007 - $409
Visio - $399
MS Project - $450
Photoshop - $630
=======================
Hardware: $500
Software:  $1978!   Yikes!  4x the cost of the hardware!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the numbers I came up with for a presentation I gave at CIPCUG recently:</p>
<p>Computer &#8211; $580   which consists of:<br />
Hardware &#8211; $500<br />
Operating System (Windows) &#8211; $80  &lt;&#8212; the OEM&#039;s &quot;Windows Tax&quot;</p>
<p>Software<br />
MS Office 2007 &#8211; $409<br />
Visio &#8211; $399<br />
MS Project &#8211; $450<br />
Photoshop &#8211; $630<br />
=======================<br />
Hardware: $500<br />
Software:  $1978!   Yikes!  4x the cost of the hardware!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Notes From My KVM (Kernel Virtual Machine) Talk. by charlesnw</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2009/07/notes-from-my-kvm-kernel-virtual-machine-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>charlesnw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actusa.net/~stu/blog/?p=263#comment-5</guid>
		<description>If you are running on a headless display, you might want to add -nographic to the end of the invocation. 

Also for windows guests I&#039;ve found -alt-grab -usb -usbdevice tablet to work better for console access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are running on a headless display, you might want to add -nographic to the end of the invocation. </p>
<p>Also for windows guests I&#8217;ve found -alt-grab -usb -usbdevice tablet to work better for console access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

